ORGANELLE

Time’s scope and thus dimension…

User: “Is there any evidence that a modern person, say, from the US, has traveled to a location in less than the time necessary to do so by car, train, or passenger jet? I am thinking about, for example, underground maglevs that service underground bases in the US. Presume this has occurred and there is evidence. Speculate on the forms of such evidence and how we might examine existing data in the quest to validate the theory that some human beings have traveled on Earth in less than the time it should take by all commonly known transport means.”

LLM: “If we were to entertain the idea that some individuals have traveled to locations in less time than traditionally possible by common transport means like cars, trains, or passenger jets, such a scenario would certainly raise questions and require robust evidence to support it. Let’s speculate on the forms of evidence and how existing data could be examined to validate such a theory:

Eyewitness Testimony: One form of evidence could be eyewitness accounts from credible sources. People who claim to have experienced such rapid travel could provide detailed descriptions of their journey, including the mode of transportation, the duration of the trip, and any unique characteristics of the travel experience.

Photographic or Video Evidence: If individuals have indeed traveled via unconventional means, there might be photographic or video evidence documenting aspects of the journey. This could include images or footage of the transportation system, the interior of the vehicle, or landmarks along the route.

Physical Evidence: Any physical artifacts associated with the alleged rapid travel, such as tickets, passes, or unique tokens issued for the transportation system, could serve as evidence. Analysis of these artifacts could provide insights into the nature of the transportation technology used.

Data Analysis: Existing data, such as satellite imagery, flight records, and transportation infrastructure data, could be examined for anomalies or patterns that suggest the existence of unconventional transportation systems. This could involve analyzing changes in infrastructure, unusual energy consumption patterns, or unexplained movements in specific regions.

Government Documentation: If such rapid transportation systems exist, there may be classified government documentation or leaked information that provides insights into their development, operation, and use. Investigative journalism or Freedom of Information Act requests could be avenues to access such documentation.

Expert Analysis: Independent experts in transportation technology, engineering, and physics could evaluate the feasibility of the proposed transportation systems and assess the likelihood of their existence based on known scientific principles and technological capabilities.

Corroborating Accounts: Multiple independent accounts of similar experiences from different individuals could lend credibility to the claims of rapid travel. Corroborating evidence from diverse sources would strengthen the case for the existence of unconventional transportation systems.

In the quest to validate the theory that some individuals have traveled on Earth in less time than expected by conventional means, a multidisciplinary approach combining eyewitness testimony, physical evidence, data analysis, and expert analysis would be necessary. It’s essential to approach such claims with skepticism and rigorously evaluate the evidence before drawing conclusions about the existence of unconventional transportation systems.”

Gemini demonstrably hallucinates whenever I re-input a graphic creation prompt…

“I used to ‘sport my clothes’ … at all times in my 20’s and 30’s. I still do. But I’m a bit less emphatic about it, to the degree that I am not appearing before many others in a social setting. If I were to do that, I would definitely sport my clothes (and shoes). Not so much because I agreed to the social scripting, but rather… naturally. I have the inclination, in my relation »with myself… to do so. Clothing purchases are catastrophically »intimate… and, to put the candle on the cake… advertisers are aware of this fact. And so, too, anyone who might ‘profile’ us, for any array of actual or ostensible purposes.”

— infraheard

∞ “The most subversive fact on earth is the most revolutionary: the anciently evolved beauty — the explosively self-advancing truth of being in all of its potentials and histories — flows within you like a speaking fire. There is no religion or description that could survive exposure to this. What you are carrying can transform worlds, and everything you’re being sold is desperate to inhibit, conceal, lie about, co-opt, or destroy it. You brought the sacred fountain with you into human birth. Now you are sold every artifact of thirst. Yet if you merely notice this, the entire situation changes. Take a close look at what you are carrying, what’s on offer as descriptions, and the difference. Find your wings. Give water to the thirsty.”

— an anonymous informant

∞ Someone posted about ‘people’ being opposed to revolution because it’s too violent, yet enduring all kinds of endemic violence. Not sure who ‘people’ are in that proposition, but it’s natural, too. This is all a mess of generalizations. Still, there’s something underneath them..

There are different layers or forms of violence, and the kind everyone is used to is highly distributed, subtle (where it’s hidden, which it usually is), and distant.

The other kind is in your face, kill your family kind of violence. Very few would choose the latter, even if there was the possibility it might mediate or resolve the former.

Also: no one has yet introduced the kinds of revolution that would actually affect the former problem dramatically, while also failing to breed new forms of atrocity.

Our species is inclined to social retrogression, and this is radically enhanced by our technologies and the imperatives of the false societies we are enmeshed in.

In America, Success can be a lethal fiction…

“Once a species achieves something resembling actual intelligence, they rather naturally concern themselves with a topic we may call ‘the preservation of the manifold’. This metatopic is at the basis of any possible motivation or desire, because, if you cannot preserve the manifold… it becomes impossible to »have minds of any kind at all. All other concerns are rendered trivial in comparison.

So it turns out that »the oldest intelligences involved in ‘protecting the basis of timespace’… their fundamental imperative… face a peculiar problem.

Organisms.

And, perhaps rather particularly, organisms whose developmental paths resemble ours. Homo Sapiens Sapiens.

Now, it turns out that organisms are absolutely crucial to the preservation of many aspects of ‘the manifold’ that must be preserved.

Yet our species, and others whose developmental arcs resemble our own, have the capacity to »intentionally collapse all manifolds accessible to us. We, in this sense, are the physical implementation of something we might call ‘the apocalypse protocols’. Imagine a pond in which highly competitive fish arise. As they develop, some of them become extremely concerned about being the Authority. These particular fishes learn the various ways to ‘drain certain locations in the pond’. This quickly proceeds to ‘drain the entire pond’ threats and posturings, as well as actual omnicidal behavior … in part because »there are no authorities capable of intervening within the bucket.

Eventually, such fish actually succeed in killing their planet. Or something close. And, if they are not denied access to the fundamental features of spacetime… they will not merely obliterate their own planet (and all of its complex organisms). They will, eventually, go after the foundation of the manifold itself.

So it is that we must perennially face this problem.

Just as we face it now with our own species. For we are not merely human. We belong, by origin and family… to the Protectors. We must maintain the viability of the Manifold. Locally, that means preserving both the anciently conserved ecologies of Earth, and the viability of the atmosphere…

In our role as Protectors, we must cause the fundamental features of timespace to become »encrypted — so that they will remain unavailable to species who defect from the primary natures and purposes of the [redacted], which we shall successfully defend.”

— Phssthpok

“… two swords clash, sparks ensue.”

—infraheard

“What the humans didn’t understand about timespace is simple: it’s the result of a broad array of transentient perspectives, intentions and concerns. What this turns out to mean is this: what humans call Physics, is not actually physics. It is the layer of encryption inherent in the composition of the universe, that acts as a barrier intended to limit the capacities of itinerant species to obliterate themselves, others… and the basis of timespace itself.

Modern physics is nothing more than the current understanding of the structure of »the encryption… rather than the structure of timespace or the fundamental situation…”

— a fragment of an ancient conversation